Yes Jono, why debate something that is based on a mega HOAX........I am referring to the demonizing of carbondioxide......a gas that is a prerequisite of ALL life on our planet.
If common sense doesn't finally prevail, Australia is stuffed. As suggested by 'Jono', what the hell is there to debate? If the Coalition is to survive it needs to admit it was wrong, reverse course, regain government and start listening to what the majority of sane voters are demanding.
Ley is dangerous, she subscribes to climate change like a good little globalist shill. Her proposed tactics are not strategically sound, they are delaying mechanisms to attract votes. Which will do nothing for the country in the long run. The only way they will shut down climate change nonsense is to completely purge the entire system from the top down. From Federal agencies to State and Local councils via some very water tight, irreversable legislation. A job so huge, they would need at least two to three terms and complete control of both houses and all state governments to pull it off. They do not have the backbone or capability to pull that off.
If they'd had the guts and the smarts to take a no net zero platform to the last election, maybe they wouldn't have lost so badly. They might as well distance themselves from the whole AGW hoax to show they're serious.
Net Zero is another slogan of the Globalists. Net Zero is contrary to the laws of physics.
If any of the Net Zero proponents believed in Net Zero they would immediately stop being complicit in the genocide of the Gazan people, which by some estimates is now over 300,000 innocent women and children. They would not be complicit in the US proxy war in Ukraine whose only objective was to defeat Russia. Both these atrocities have done extensive damage to our environment.If any politician who mentions Net Zero, is complicit in genocide, supplies armaments to wars, allows foreign armed forces on our soil, partakes in war games far from our shores and is subservient to the biggest war monger in history, they should all be tried, for not only treason ,but crimes against humanity. Jono and Fossil1 are right on the money.
I can’t believe they even have to debate it… sigh!
Yes Jono, why debate something that is based on a mega HOAX........I am referring to the demonizing of carbondioxide......a gas that is a prerequisite of ALL life on our planet.
Too little, too late! They're still supporting all of the other WHO/UN/WEF 'agenda' items.
If common sense doesn't finally prevail, Australia is stuffed. As suggested by 'Jono', what the hell is there to debate? If the Coalition is to survive it needs to admit it was wrong, reverse course, regain government and start listening to what the majority of sane voters are demanding.
Ley is dangerous, she subscribes to climate change like a good little globalist shill. Her proposed tactics are not strategically sound, they are delaying mechanisms to attract votes. Which will do nothing for the country in the long run. The only way they will shut down climate change nonsense is to completely purge the entire system from the top down. From Federal agencies to State and Local councils via some very water tight, irreversable legislation. A job so huge, they would need at least two to three terms and complete control of both houses and all state governments to pull it off. They do not have the backbone or capability to pull that off.
If they'd had the guts and the smarts to take a no net zero platform to the last election, maybe they wouldn't have lost so badly. They might as well distance themselves from the whole AGW hoax to show they're serious.
Net Zero is another slogan of the Globalists. Net Zero is contrary to the laws of physics.
If any of the Net Zero proponents believed in Net Zero they would immediately stop being complicit in the genocide of the Gazan people, which by some estimates is now over 300,000 innocent women and children. They would not be complicit in the US proxy war in Ukraine whose only objective was to defeat Russia. Both these atrocities have done extensive damage to our environment.If any politician who mentions Net Zero, is complicit in genocide, supplies armaments to wars, allows foreign armed forces on our soil, partakes in war games far from our shores and is subservient to the biggest war monger in history, they should all be tried, for not only treason ,but crimes against humanity. Jono and Fossil1 are right on the money.