The Rise of the Man-Bun
Nation First's Dr Moxie wonders what brings a man to wear candy pink nail polish.
Dear friend,
Make sure you check out all the AUSTRALIAN news that they don’t want you to read at www.EurekaFreePress.com — your pro-freedom news source!
You can support Eureka Free Press at www.eurekafreepress.com/support-eureka-free-press or by clicking the button below.
Your support will help Eureka Free Press contract original news stories as well as market the site online, spreading pro-freedom news to as many Australians as possible.
The Rise of the Man-Bun
By the Moxie Philosopher
Whilst watching the evening news (and against my better judgement) I happened to come across an ad for a popular reality dating show donning a man who had painted pink fingernails.
Yes… Apparently, men painting their fingernails is quite the norm now for millennials and younger generations.
Okay. Wax your legs, exfoliate, moisturise and manscape. Whatever floats your boat.
Men painting their nails is a new trend among younger generations
Feminism has led to widespread misandry and is negatively affecting boys and men
The decline of masculine traits has resulted in structural and social changes and a decline in marriage and birth rates
Selecting more feminine men to mate with may have long-term impacts on our species' evolution
The traditional family structure with strong male leadership is crucial for the long-term survival of the family unit.
Besides being perplexed on a purely aesthetic level (it was candy pink, after all!), my thoughts immediately turned to the biological basis for sex-selection and how evolution appears to be taking a turn.
What will that mean for us as a species, I thought to myself… and, why are some females becoming attracted to more feminine-looking blokes?
NOTE: To save from being de-platformed, I have opted not to post the latest Nation First video on YouTube, so instead watch the video at Rumble or click the image below.
Homo sapiens are biological organisms primed to find the best mate to reproduce; we are born to replicate, as any other organism.
Females have, over thousands of years, evolved to find mates who are going to produce healthy offspring and be able to protect and provide for said offspring.
That means physical traits associated with health, strength, and stature.
Testosterone dominates.
The rise of the beta male has led to many structural and social changes; we need only look at the aptitude of leaders who now pace the halls of power: entirely banal, insipid and uninspiring.
On the flip-side, we have become a more peaceful species due to an overall waning in global conflicts and the alleviation of extreme poverty which fuels war (which is a good thing considering the deadly weaponry at the fingertips of aforementioned insipid leaders).
But in the Western world, we also have a troubling decline in marriage, birth rates and a mental health pandemic disproportionately affecting boys and men.
As I pointed out in one of my previous articles, men and boys are unfairly ascribed perpetrator status by broader society, whilst failing to receive any credit and support for the sacrifices they make to keep society functioning, and women and children protected.
Men are, more often than not, being punished for their masculinity; branding their natural biological status as ‘toxic’ is hardly beneficial.
All of this is as a result of ardent destructive feminism that has gone too far, led us down a path of widespread misandry and entirely missed the point of equality.
It’s no wonder boys are confused.
In a world where holding a door open for a woman can result in female-led abuse and insults for not ‘supporting equality’; what are they supposed to do?
The development of females to selecting man-bun-pink-nail-polish-wearers over males who are, well, masculine, will certainly have a long-term impact.
I was reflecting on observations of hyena packs that had become female dominant.
Not only did the females start taking on male traits, but they also became the aggressors.
So rather than a complete decline in violence, it just shifted to a different form.
Is this happening before our eyes?
And what about the family and tradition?
The hierarchical family structure developed over many generations because it works, not only culturally, but practically.
Allow me to clarify, I don’t mean men being abusive here… let me make that very clear!
What I mean is a mutually supportive environment where there is a head of household to provide balance and leadership, particularly in times of crisis.
The traditional nurturing roles for women work because that is what we were biologically primed to do: raise and care for children.
Our bodies are built for breast feeding and kissing little cheeks.
That is a beautiful thing, not a burden. (And much more fulfilling than being a corporate high-flyer!)
And we need strong men who are not afraid to ‘be men’ and take the lead, not only in the family context, but also in broader decision-making forums.
Strength and leadership does not equal aggression and it is crucial for the long-term survival of the family unit.
The development of gender neutrality is certainly something to consider for the next generation.
Balance is usually key to everything in life.
And this is no different.
We need strong men of integrity and compassion to have a full and healthy society.
Usually, these values are instilled by the family with healthy male and female role models.
The ancients knew all about balance: the yin and yang, the sun and moon, war and peace.
Women and men have evolved to have different strengths because balance is a good thing for our species.
The responsibility for rise of the man-bun is clearly one for the generation of young people currently churning through our flawed education system.
I believe it’s time to start home-schooling… our survival depends on it.
But that’s a thought for another day.
Dr Moxie is a Sydney based professional. She has worked to advance human rights and justice causes for over two decades. She holds several degrees in politics, national security, human rights and philosophy.
George Christensen is a former Australian politician, a Christian, freedom lover, conservative, blogger, podcaster, journalist and theologian. He has been feted by the Epoch Times as a “champion of human rights” and his writings have been praised by Infowars’ Alex Jones as “excellent and informative”.
George believes Nation First will be an essential part of the ongoing fight for freedom:
“The time is now for every proud patriot to step to the fore and fight for our freedom, sovereignty and way of life. Information is a key tool in any battle and the Nation First newsletter will be a valuable tool in the battle for the future of the West.”
— George Christensen.
Find more about George at his www.georgechristensen.com.au website.
Think back to the medieval days of ponsy dressed men of the nobility and rich! Powdered wigs, puffy pants, fancy stockings and shoes. Makes you wonder. But they had swords too!
Whilst I agree that men ARE different to women, and should absolutely remain so, I do not agree that there needs to be "strong male leadership...for the long-term survival of the family unit."
In so many families, the woman is the 'power behind the throne' so to speak. Women do more household chores and child-rearing, yes, but they often manage the finances, too, whilst the men WORK!
Instead, perhaps it should read 'strong male drive...that complements the family unit and leads to its survival.'
Whenever I see a couple where the woman is passive and the man is dominant, I find it a very sorry sight indeed. Men are naturally physically stronger, taller and rougher, so should they then hold ALL the cards?
In my marriage, I've always been the more 'aggressive' one (because I've had to fight for every bloody thing in my life as long as I can remember!). But we are not aggressive with eachother; we have a wonderful marriage and our energies complement eachother very well. But, like those female hyenas, I can stand my own ground very well, thankyou very much, without the need for a helping hand (although a helping hand is always nice!). But I think that study into the lack of social support when the female hyena is the aggressor can also be seen in humans. A woman being tough and stubborn and aggressive garners less far support than a male doing the same. It's a harder road for her. But she absolutely CAN do it. And sometimes she has to.
The problem becomes when she has to do it too often - or permanently. The stress of this will result in women slightly shifting towards a more 'male' brain. When men show more effeminate traits, and don't stand their ground enough (eg to save their family), not only do they slightly shift towards a more 'female' brain, but the family unit survival is then left to the female, compounding the problem. And eventually, that will lead to more divorces because she feels SHE'S the one doing everything: from changing the lightbulbs to paying the mortgage to cleaning the house to rearing the kids. Ultimately, what woman needs a guy when she can do everything herself?!?!
As for effeminate traits, sure, my hubby might have long hair, but he's had it for 20+ years - and he would NEVER willingly wear nail polish. Look, I understand the Dads that let their 9-year old daughter paint their nails to keep the kid happy once in a blue moon. My hubby even brushes & ties back our youngest's hair (not that he does a great job, but he tries!) in time for school. So the job at least gets done. But he's not trying to be an amateur hairdresser, nor does he get pleasure from having her locks right (as evidenced by the slightly messy job!). I, however, like to get it right when I do it, and have it as perfect as possible and looking great! Hubby is happier building us a house & a shed, whilst getting grubby in outdoors work gear! And then he also holds down a well-paying IT job to support the family. I do more of the housework, but that's fine. Not only do I like it more, I also do a far better job of it! :-D
So yes, things work better when males & females keep appropriate roles. When the guys start pushing into female territory, and staying there, things are going to end badly. Men having a short foray into some feminine traits, for survival purposes, is not a biggie in my books. But whole populations shifting to this permanently is a HUGE thing - and will not end well.