They’re Coming for What You Haven’t Earned
Nation First analyses how Australia’s new retirement savings tax targets unrealised gains, threatening the savings and trust of hardworking Australians.
Dear friend,
They’re calling it “modest.” They’re calling it “targeted.” But let’s call it what it is: theft.
From July 1st, the Australian government—at the behest of its Treasurer Jim Chalmers—is planning something unprecedented: taxing money that doesn’t exist. Not profits you’ve made—profits you haven’t. Not earnings in your pocket—but imagined values on a spreadsheet. Welcome to a bold new era of economic lunacy.
The Australian government plans to tax unrealised capital gains in large superannuation funds from July 1st, impacting those who haven’t actually received income.
Hardworking Australians like farmers, retirees, and small investors will be forced to sell assets to pay tax on paper gains.
The policy’s threshold isn’t inflation-indexed, meaning more people will be caught in the tax net over time.
Critics argue this move undermines trust in the superannuation system and disproportionately spares political elites with protected pensions.
Economic leaders warn the policy could push capital offshore, hurt innovation, and mirror failed overseas experiments like Norway’s wealth tax.
This tax on unrealised gains is not a joke. It’s not a drill. And it’s not just a policy mistake—it’s a declaration of war on Australians who worked hard, saved smart, invested wisely, and trusted the system.
They’ve dressed it up in spin. “Only affects 0.5%,” they say. But what they don’t say is this: that 0.5% includes the backbone of this nation. The farmers. The small business owners. The SMSF (Self-Managed Super Fund) retirees. The builders, the battlers, and yes, the strivers—people who followed the rules and built their own futures.
Let me show you exactly who Chalmers is coming for:
There’s Peter and Jenny, sheep graziers in regional New South Wales, who took financial advice a decade ago and bought the adjoining property through their super fund. That land’s value has risen—on paper—but the farm brings in just enough to cover the bills. Now, under Labor’s plan, they’ll be taxed thousands on “gains” they’ve never realised. They’ll have to sell stock. Or worse, sell land. Because the bureaucrats in Canberra say their farm’s “worth” more.
There’s Margaret, a 71-year-old widow in Toowoomba. Her late husband built their super fund to $4 million over 40 years of careful saving and dividend reinvestment. They lived modestly. Never took holidays. Drove second-hand cars. Now, she’s being told she owes tens of thousands in tax on the supposed “growth” in her retirement savings—despite never touching a cent of it. Margaret’s choice? Sell shares or sell her home.
Then there’s Jackson, a 40-something software engineer in Brisbane, who backed a mate’s start-up through his super fund. That start-up just closed a funding round, doubling its valuation—on paper. Jackson’s now staring down a tax bill on “gains” he can’t cash out. The company isn’t liquid. The shares can’t be sold. Jackson’s reward for taking a risk on Aussie innovation? He’s pulling the plug on his SMSF altogether.
This is what Jim Chalmers—Australia’s grinning Treasurer and architect of this madness—has unleashed: fear, confusion, forced liquidation, and betrayal. And backing him? The faceless Treasury elites—Canberra lifers who’ve never run a business or paid staff wages, hiding behind spreadsheets and bureaucratic jargon while they gut the real economy.
The threshold is not even indexed to inflation, and superannuation often increases in multiples of the inflation rate. So, by its nature it is designed to quietly rope in more Australians with every passing year. What might seem like a wealthy balance today will become middle-class by tomorrow’s standards. Take a 40-something professional today with $1 million in their super—safe for now. But their kids? By the time they retire, inflation will have quietly pushed their balances well over the limit. The system is set up to ensnare them.
And let’s not forget The Greens, Australia’s progressive party that now holds the balance of power in the upper house (Senate). With their hands on the legislative tiller, they’ve been crystal clear about their intentions: they want the threshold slashed to $2 million—and they want the 50% capital gains tax discount scrapped for most assets. This isn’t speculation. It’s their stated policy. Once that CGT discount is gone, what’s left to bargain with? The entire framework of retirement planning and investment confidence begins to collapse.
Remember that $1 million super contribution campaign back in 2006–07? The government practically begged Australians to pour after-tax dollars into their super before the rules changed. Many did exactly that. Small business owners. Farm families. Quiet achievers who never asked for a handout, employed hundreds over decades, and paid millions in taxes. Now, those same Australians are being punished—retrospectively—for trusting the system.
Is this what fairness looks like? Taxing people not on what they’ve earned, but on a concept? On a number someone in Treasury typed into a spreadsheet?
Even Bob Katter, a veteran politician who represents a poor rural electorate in far north Queensland, is fuming. He put it plainly:
“Labor’s policy to tax unrealised capital gains in super accounts is ludicrous… This will have catastrophic effects on anyone with a farm, a house, or similar asset held by a super fund. You may have to sell your asset just to pay the tax. It won’t touch the mega-rich. It will break the back of middle Australia.”
Meanwhile, those imposing this tax won’t feel the heat. A growing number of senior officials—including many former state premiers, judges, and top bureaucrats—are exempt from the tax due to legacy pension schemes enshrined in law. Federal politicians also escape unscathed under special retirement provisions. To remove these legal shields would require a national referendum—a political impossibility.
That means while you pay tax on imaginary gains, they keep collecting taxpayer-guaranteed, inflation-proof pensions with zero exposure to the market volatility that affects ordinary Australians. This is the very definition of two-tiered hypocrisy.
And it’s not just retirees and farmers who are speaking out. Australia’s most respected economic minds are sounding the alarm.
Dr Philip Lowe, the former Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, broke his post-retirement silence to say bluntly:
“I am not convinced this is good public policy… We should be exploring other ways to adjust the concessional tax rates on high super balances.”
Dr Ken Henry, former Treasury Secretary and architect of the Henry Tax Review, said he was baffled as to why Labor ignored fairer alternatives:
“There are other options… you do not need to tax unrealised capital gains to achieve equity.”
Geoff Wilson AO, founder of $6 billion fund manager Wilson Asset Management, has been one of the loudest voices in the fight. He warns that this tax will force retirees to sell assets, choke off venture capital, and send capital flying offshore. He summed it up best:
“It’s not about taxing the wealthy. It’s about punishing the responsible. Investors will leave. Start-ups will suffer. And it will backfire—hard.”
Want proof? Look to Norway, where a similar policy sparked an exodus of the country’s wealth creators. The government expected a revenue boost from their wealth tax on unrealised gains. Instead, over 100 of the country’s top 400 taxpayers fled—many to Switzerland—taking billions in capital with them. Entrepreneur Tord Ueland Kolstad, who moved to Lucerne, put it simply:
“The system is designed so that it confiscates more than you can produce.”
That’s what happens when governments punish ambition.
So let’s be clear: this isn’t just bad tax policy. It’s a blueprint for economic sabotage.
If we allow this Trojan horse through the gates—this tax on potential, on paper, on perception—what’s next? Your investment property? Your family home? Your business?
Because if they can tax imaginary growth in superannuation today, nothing is safe tomorrow.
What can you do?
Contact Treasurer Jim Chalmers at either jim.chalmers@treasury.gov.au or jim.chalmers.mp@aph.gov.au
. Contact your local Federal MP. Flood their inboxes. Call their offices. Tell them this is not a tax reform—it’s an economic betrayal.
Share this article. With your family. Your friends. Your accountant. Your financial adviser. Get loud. Get visible. Get others informed.
This isn’t just about tax. It’s about trust. It’s about fairness. And it’s about whether hard work and sacrifice are still respected in this country—or just quietly plundered by those in charge.
Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.
Take care,
George Christensen
George Christensen is a former Australian politician, a Christian, freedom lover, conservative, blogger, podcaster, journalist and theologian. He has been feted by the Epoch Times as a “champion of human rights” and his writings have been praised by Infowars’ Alex Jones as “excellent and informative”.
George believes Nation First will be an essential part of the ongoing fight for freedom:
“The time is now for every proud patriot to step to the fore and fight for our freedom, sovereignty and way of life. Information is a key tool in any battle and the Nation First newsletter will be a valuable tool in the battle for the future of the West.”
— George Christensen.
Find more about George at his www.georgechristensen.com.au website.
THey are so tied into the One World Government system. This is part of their agenda "You will own nothing and be happy" rubbish. I am yet to work out what their definition of "happy" is.
This is just typical Labor, as soon as they get in by a landslide (er well less primary than even Julia Gillard could elicit in 2010 and she was unpopular) they pull some really crappy policy out of their back pocket and this is it. I can't believe the poor design of this, especially not indexing it to inflation. With Inflation most likely still at 7% or more, in 10yrs wages will need to double and by the time the young workers retire in 40yrs even the poorest could exceed this cap. To deny SMSF the power of compound interest by stealing profits every year, most likely to give to their pet projects, like wind mills and panels, we will be like 3rd world status, once the Mining exports dry up, China can source from elsewhere. Only ones cheering this stupid idea on would be the public servants and those getting some welfare like medically unemployable, heck about a quarter of the population has some disability nowadays, that's way above the world average.