UK Retreats on Hate Speech as Free Speech Casualties Mount
Nation First looks into how UK police are quietly rolling back draconian policing of “non-crime hate incidents” after legal wins.
Dear friend,
Just as Australia considers ramping up “hate speech” laws, police in the UK are quietly rolling back their enforcement of such laws, both online and elsewhere.
The silent retreat from policing non-crimes pre-empts the potentially damning contents of a government review soon to be released.
Britain is quietly retreating from policing “hate speech” just as Australia moves to expand it.
Non-crime hate policing has wasted resources while real crimes go largely unpunished.
Even UK authorities now admit these laws have crushed free speech and lack balance.
Labour defends pre-emptive policing of thoughts despite court rulings favouring free expression.
The rollback comes too late for victims like pro-life activists and Lucy Connolly
Announced in July 2025, the review came about after intense debate in the House of Commons last November.
Almost a year ago to the day, members such as Independent, Lord Ian Austin of Dudley, slammed Britain’s policing of thought crimes as “absurd.”
In 2023 alone, Austin recalled “police recording more than 13,000 so-called non-hate crime incidents.”
These, he said, “involved the investigation of schoolchildren and others for utterly absurd reasons.”
“I myself was investigated for calling Hamas Islamists,” he explained. (Also see here and here).
“Meanwhile, just 2% of rapes and 4% of burglaries lead to someone being charged.”
“Shoplifting has been virtually decriminalised, and there is an epidemic of mobile phone theft on the streets of London.”
The “progressive” policy of policing Non-Crime Hate Incidents has drained precious resources to the benefit of those who commit actual crimes, Austin intimated.
For both the Police and the public, Austin said, non-crime policing is utter nonsense.
Unsurprisingly, Austin backed the independent inquiry.
A 4-page press release announcing the review was published by the National Police Chief’s Council 7 months later.
Listing their aims, the NPCC said, the review would “determine whether the current police approach to reporting and recording incidents which are not crimes, was fit for purpose.”
They want to ensure there is a balance “between preventing harm and protecting human rights freedoms.”
This strongly implied there was currently no balance between the two.
Put another way, UK authorities were admitting that the consequence of policing so-called “hate speech” was destroying freedom of speech.
Instead of ditching the law, though, Keir Starmer’s socialist government responded to a people’s petition, saying they’re determined to get the law right.
Replying to the 35,000-strong protest in June, UK Labour recommitted itself to the “Minority Report” style of pre-emptive justice.
Predicting “hate crimes” by policing thoughts “that could escalate into more serious harm” was a valid use of law enforcement, they effectively argued.
“Trivial, irrational and/or malicious complaints” were the reason why the current law wasn’t working.
UK Labour then blamed the previous Conservative government for the law’s dysfunction.
Of significance, they indicated that the review was less a response to petitions and protests, and more of a response to “recent court rulings” in favour of free speech.
The review, Labour said, “will cover when the police should record information that has not yet reached the criminal threshold, but which is still deemed necessary to monitor community tensions and keep the public safe.”
While welcome, the review may be of little comfort for victims of the “non-crime” persecution.
Such as pro-life groups, arrested because the UK government considered their silent prayers violence.
Nor does the rollback save Lucy Connolly.
The 42-year-old mum was released in August after serving 9 months of a 3-year sentence for an X post she quickly deleted.
Reacting to the suspected Islamist-motivated stabbing of 3 young girls in 2024, Connolly called for “mass deportation,” and for “all the f****** hotels full of the b****ds to be burned down.”
“If that makes me racist, so be it.”
Although free, Connolly’s freedom is heavily regulated for the remainder of her sentence.
Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.
Take care,
Rod Lampard
George Christensen is a former Australian politician, a Christian, freedom lover, conservative, blogger, podcaster, journalist and theologian. He has been feted by the Epoch Times as a “champion of human rights” and his writings have been praised by Infowars’ Alex Jones as “excellent and informative”.
George believes Nation First will be an essential part of the ongoing fight for freedom:
“The time is now for every proud patriot to step to the fore and fight for our freedom, sovereignty and way of life. Information is a key tool in any battle and the Nation First newsletter will be a valuable tool in the battle for the future of the West.”
— George Christensen.
Find more about George at his www.georgechristensen.com.au website.










"Islamist'-motivated -- it's THE JEWS AND SATANISTS AND ISRAEL AND THEIR SUPPORTERS. ALWAYS IS, AND ALWAYS WILL BE.
https://citizensamericaparty.org/gratuitous_violence.htm
Bondi Beach:
https://citizensamericaparty.org/isis.htm#Demonic_Force
END TIME BIBLE PROPHECY DEATH DECREE IS COMING FOR ALL WHO WILL NOT HONOR SUNDAY THE MARK OF THE BEAST ⚠️⏰‼️‼️
📣📣📣TELL THE WORLD 🌎🌍 TODAY AND SHARE THIS POST.
"And cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed” (Revelation 13:15).
The United States, as head of this international movement, will influence the nations of the world to impose a death sentence upon all who refuse to worship the beast or his image. Another name for this worldwide coalition is “Babylon the Great. This worldwide alliance will, in the name of Christ, substitute the policeman’s power for the Holy Spirit’s gentle persuasion—and it will force worship.
The final points of contention will be worshiping and obeying the beast and receiving his mark—honoring Sunday as a false holy day versus worshiping and obeying Christ and receiving His mark by honoring the holy seventh-day Sabbath. When the issues become clear and people are forced to break the Sabbath or be killed, those who then choose Sunday will be, in essence, worshiping the beast. They will have chosen to obey the word of a creature, a man, instead of the word of their Creator, Jesus Christ.
Here is the papacy’s own statement: “The church changed Sabbath to Sunday and all the world bows down and worships upon that day in silent obedience to the mandates of the Catholic Church” (Hartford Weekly Call, February 22, 1884)."
📣 What other factors could help set the stage for a worldwide law to execute those who refuse to violate conscience?
Answer: We cannot name them with certainty, but a few looming possibilities include:
A. The activity of terrorists
B. Riots and escalating crime and evil
C. Drug wars
D. A major economic crash
E. Epidemics
F. Nuclear threats from radical nations
G. Political corruption
H. Gross miscarriage of justice by the courts
I. Social and political issues
J. Increasing taxes
K. Pornography and other immorality
L. Global disasters
M. Radical “special interest” groups"
A backlash against terrorism, lawlessness, immorality, permissiveness, injustice, poverty, ineffective political leaders, and many similar woes could easily precipitate a demand for strong, specific laws to be rigidly enforced."
The Bible says, “The time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service” (John 16:2).
Is it possible that this will be literally fulfilled in our time?
Yes. The end-time coalition of world governments and religions will finally lose all sympathy for God’s people, those who refuse to join the counterfeit revival or adopt Sunday worship. They will feel that the miracles accompanying their revival prove its validity—miracles such as the sick being healed or notorious God-haters, immoral celebrities, and well-known criminals being converted. The coalition will insist that no one be permitted to ruin this worldwide revival. Everyone will be urged to lay aside personal feelings and “fanatical teachings” (the Sabbath, for example) and join with the rest of the world in its revival for peace and brotherhood. Those who do not agree to cooperate will be considered disloyal, unpatriotic, anarchists and, finally, dangerous fanatics who must not be tolerated. In that day, those who kill God’s people will feel they are doing God a favor.
The battle itself will be worldwide. Governments will try to destroy God’s people, but God will intervene. The symbolic river Euphrates will be dried up (Revelation 16:12). Water represents people (Revelation 17:15). The drying up of the river Euphrates means that the people who have been supporting the beast (Satan’s kingdom) will suddenly withdraw their support. The beast’s support will thus dry up. Its coalition of allies (Revelation 16:13, 14) will fall apart (Revelation 16:19).
Jesus’ second coming will halt this battle and save His people (Revelation 6:14–17; 16:18–21; 19:11–20)."
Are you willing to worship and obey Jesus even if it means ridicule, persecution, and finally the death sentence?
📢📢📢WAKE UP CHILDREN OF GOD OPEN YOUR BIBLES 📖 AND STUDY IT SHARE THIS MESSAGE WITH YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS FACEBOOK PAGES AND GROUPS GIVE YOUR HEART ❤️ TO JESUS REPENT WORSHIP GOD ALONE AND KEEP HIS HOLY LAW AND HIS HOLY SABBATH JESUS IS COMING BACK SOON 🔜 THERE IS NOT MUCH TIME 🔚⏰‼️.