Do you really understand the Voice?
Nation First looks into the proposed Indigenous Voice to the Australian Parliament and doesn't like what it sees!
Dear friend,
The Australian Government proposes a referendum to change their nation’s Constitution, creating a racially-based constitutional body exclusively for Aboriginal people called the ‘Indigenous Voice to Parliament’.
This proposed chamber would review legislation affecting Aboriginal people, potentially reviewing every law proposed by the democratically-elected Parliament.
The so-called ‘Voice’ will hold significant influence, making it difficult for the government to reject its recommendations without being labelled ‘racist’.
This ‘Voice’ would also advise the executive government on implementing laws and regulations.
The proposal is racist, undemocratic, and a trojan horse for globalist control over Australia, benefiting only a privileged layer of indigenous individuals.
Nation First has been on hiatus for the past four days but only because we wanted to bring you a special paid subscribers-only analysis of the proposed ‘Indigenous Voice to the Australian Parliament’.1
For those outside of Australia, or those who have no idea what this so-called ‘Voice’ is all about, here’s a quick overview:
The left-wing Australian Government have decided to propose a referendum to change the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia in order to set up a racially-based constitutional body that (despite protests from so-called ‘fact-checkers’) many have rightfully said looks suspiciously like a third chamber of the legislature, sitting alongside the House of Representatives and the Senate.
That’s right: a quasi-chamber of parliament that is constituted on the basis of race, specifically those of the Aboriginal race of Australia.
The new look www.EurekaFreePress.com — your pro-freedom news source — will launch on Monday, 3 July 2023!
Eureka Free Press will be migrating to Substack but will remain a free news aggregation service for all regardless of whether they are paid or free subscribers.
You can support Eureka Free Press on Substack with a paid subscription, or you can support the current Eureka Free Press website at www.eurekafreepress.com/support-eureka-free-press
Your support will help Eureka Free Press contract original news stories as well as market the site online, spreading pro-freedom news to as many Australians as possible.
The so-called ‘Indigenous Voice to Parliament’ as they call it would have the remit to review any legislation affecting Aboriginal people in Australia and, given that every law passed by parliament affects every Australian, that means that this race-based chamber will potentially be reviewing every single law proposed by the actual democratically-elected Parliament and putting forward potential changes to said laws.
While some claim that any changes to laws coming from the so-called ‘Voice’ would be recommendations only, the reality is that in this woke era, it would be a brave government or parliament that rejected its calls, no doubt fearful of being labelled ‘racist’.
More so, the so-called ‘Voice’ will have a role in advising the executive government on the implementation of laws and regulations.
If you’re still having trouble understanding what is, admitted, a complex and peculiarly Australian issue, imagine for a moment, the Biden Administration proposing a constitutional amendment to set up an outfit alongside the Congress that would be made up entirely of Native Americans and that would have the right to interfere in the decisions of the democratically-elected House of Representatives and Congress, and a right to interfere in decisions emanating from the White House.
The racist and undemocratic nature of the ‘Indigenous Voice to the Australian Parliament’ makes the proposal plainly wrong in principle.
It is also a bad idea because it won’t do anything to improve the lives of everyday Aboriginal Australians but instead, as even the World Socialist Web Site acknowledges “the Voice would entrench and enhance the power of a privileged layer of indigenous CEOs, business operators, bureaucrats and senior academics”.
But the fact is that the so-called ‘Voice’ is more than just racist, undemocratic, and a waste of money; it is, in fact, a trojan horse for globalist control over Australia.
To expose the fact it’s a trojan horse, here’s my special paid subscribers-only analysis of the ‘Indigenous Voice to the Australian Parliament’:
You can also read a past FREE article on the ‘Indigenous Voice to the Australian Parliament’ which is succinctly titled ‘It’s Racist’.
Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.
Take care,
George Christensen, with a Nation First staff writer
George Christensen is a former Australian politician, a Christian, freedom lover, conservative, blogger, podcaster, journalist and theologian. He has been feted by the Epoch Times as a “champion of human rights” and his writings have been praised by Infowars’ Alex Jones as “excellent and informative”.
George believes Nation First will be an essential part of the ongoing fight for freedom:
“The time is now for every proud patriot to step to the fore and fight for our freedom, sovereignty and way of life. Information is a key tool in any battle and the Nation First newsletter will be a valuable tool in the battle for the future of the West.”
— George Christensen.
Find more about George at his www.georgechristensen.com.au website.
Authorised by G. Christensen, Te Kowai (Mackay)
Our daily articles are normally short analyses of around 500 to 600 words in length but this special article on the so-called ‘Voice’ comes in at over 1,500 words.
Undecided about Voice,? NO is only sensible answer Real indigenous being manipulated by a few so -called academics freely educated to improve their people's help,but dont These urban dwelling academics out of touch with genuine people instead fostering and brainwashing those living on capital and larger cities outskirts Our Constitution shouldn't be altered to allow a group of semi educated self acknowledged indigenous ones dictate to the rest of Australia when all residents migrants included are as one people. Torres Straits have little to complain about and could secede to PNG if unhappy with Australian benefits Always felt that court ruling on their land claims and demands are questionable and not as accurate as stated so if wanting to be a separate nation do it themselves