The Voice is just another satanic event to confuse and divide the vulnerable. We are all equal in Jesus under Yahweh, regardless of race. As a white occupant of our great southland, I am apalled by the vicious deeds of our forefathers. Our first nations people deserve the respect of fellow brothers under Christ, nothing more. We will all face our maker one day, black, white, or brindle. For me, I report to Jesus daily. What a shock to the system this would be if we alll did it.
Perhaps you should research the "vicious deeds of our forefathers." And then research the vicious deeds of aborigines against our forefathers!
Aborigines slaughtered the Fraser family near Taroom in 1857.
Slaughtered a family and others (19 people in all) in Rockhampton in 1861.
Ten slaughtered in Nogoa in 1861.
Mother and baby girl at Lizard Island in 1881.
An entire family massacred by aborigines in Breelong, near Coonamble in 1900.
Another 5 slaughtered in Gilgandra in 1900.
I could go on...
And to set a record straight about Fraser Island. It was NOT named after Eliza Fraser. It was named after the Fraser family slaughtered near Taroom in 1857! AND all the aborigines living their died out! So how it's been "given back" to aborigines is beyond me when there aren't any of that tribe left!
You may be appalled by your forefathers. I am NOT. As a descendant of slave convict stock and free settlers who made Australia the great country it is today, I am proud of them!
Kalkadoons cannabalised many miners and settlers women included during Palmer River gold rush Chinese were deemed very tasty white man not as he eat too much salt Many people were illegal migrants so they were never fully identified It was always a two way street
Words can explain ,denigrate describe applaud terrify amplify soften or bemuse us depending on the manner in which they are delivered to listener or by speaker. Acceptance of details is another matter when soft non intended remarks becomes a boiling point that refutes the comment Voice supporters seem to think that we should pay indigenous to live their former tribal life but with full modern facilities provided by us .Past lives are gone in todays world but should be cherished and used only for special occasions where they will have more impact True indigenous at the base of the fingernails have a small patch of darker skin as proof of ancestry and this mark also applies to other non whites. Indigenous only two genes removed from white unlike African blacks who are four so intermixing with white in two generations can absorb full aboriginality No differences
"Dangerously, the Voice amendment would do two things. First, it would extend without limit the presently-listed powers granted to Parliament to make laws on behalf of the people of Australia. Second, it would give power to the Voice to agree a treaty on behalf of descendants of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, even without their agreement. "
Like you indigenous has become sensationl;ised to suit Voice progress Never heard of some the BS presently dished out by urban dwelling indigenous but have seen many rorts being carried on from way back and I'm ninety one No flag no connected nation no common language no history all fragmented ideas since late last century when that manufactured "flag" appeared as a calling point for indigenous My maternal great grandfather taught aboriginals leather raft to ride & care for horses got them into native police where they used their status to exact payback on any other tribes & terrified the local ones They were real people not like todays who are torn between dreams and reality
I hear and read much about why we should vote no. However I don’t read much about a viable, practical alternative solution to take the place of the voice in parliament. Not just an idea, but something workable.
We have other countries that have gone before us on this matter and failed that we can learn from, but do we have other countries that have put successful indigenous policies in place that we can learn from?
It seems like a parallel to the ancient Israelites whom God ordained to live in (now) Israel. They were ordered to NOT worship the pagan gods of the Canaanites. What do we have today in modern Christian Australia? Exactly the same scenario. We take the knee we welcome to country and have smoking ceremonies to unbelievably drive away evil spirits. Is this not idolatry and pagan rituals? We see our illustrious PM and his henchmen at Aboriginal functions grinning like fools as the part Aboriginals parade their Stone Age practices in front of a civilised parliamentary delegation. They also display a lot of red. Now I may be wrong, but did the aboriginees have cloth making and red dyes in their culture?
On another note George, digital ID is heating up, yet again. The push is full on. One thing I didn't know - "Home Affairs and Cyber Security Minister Clare O'Neil recently announced new cyber governance and regulation changes making directors culpable for failing to properly secure digital assets. "
I wonder how many people are aware of this?
It's ironic "they" keep pushing the digital ID agenda to keep us "safe," when going even more digital is the cause for more hacking! (And monitoring of course).
The Voice is just another satanic event to confuse and divide the vulnerable. We are all equal in Jesus under Yahweh, regardless of race. As a white occupant of our great southland, I am apalled by the vicious deeds of our forefathers. Our first nations people deserve the respect of fellow brothers under Christ, nothing more. We will all face our maker one day, black, white, or brindle. For me, I report to Jesus daily. What a shock to the system this would be if we alll did it.
Perhaps you should research the "vicious deeds of our forefathers." And then research the vicious deeds of aborigines against our forefathers!
Aborigines slaughtered the Fraser family near Taroom in 1857.
Slaughtered a family and others (19 people in all) in Rockhampton in 1861.
Ten slaughtered in Nogoa in 1861.
Mother and baby girl at Lizard Island in 1881.
An entire family massacred by aborigines in Breelong, near Coonamble in 1900.
Another 5 slaughtered in Gilgandra in 1900.
I could go on...
And to set a record straight about Fraser Island. It was NOT named after Eliza Fraser. It was named after the Fraser family slaughtered near Taroom in 1857! AND all the aborigines living their died out! So how it's been "given back" to aborigines is beyond me when there aren't any of that tribe left!
You may be appalled by your forefathers. I am NOT. As a descendant of slave convict stock and free settlers who made Australia the great country it is today, I am proud of them!
Kalkadoons cannabalised many miners and settlers women included during Palmer River gold rush Chinese were deemed very tasty white man not as he eat too much salt Many people were illegal migrants so they were never fully identified It was always a two way street
Words can explain ,denigrate describe applaud terrify amplify soften or bemuse us depending on the manner in which they are delivered to listener or by speaker. Acceptance of details is another matter when soft non intended remarks becomes a boiling point that refutes the comment Voice supporters seem to think that we should pay indigenous to live their former tribal life but with full modern facilities provided by us .Past lives are gone in todays world but should be cherished and used only for special occasions where they will have more impact True indigenous at the base of the fingernails have a small patch of darker skin as proof of ancestry and this mark also applies to other non whites. Indigenous only two genes removed from white unlike African blacks who are four so intermixing with white in two generations can absorb full aboriginality No differences
Aboriginal DNA is Melanesian.
Thank you for this.
"Dangerously, the Voice amendment would do two things. First, it would extend without limit the presently-listed powers granted to Parliament to make laws on behalf of the people of Australia. Second, it would give power to the Voice to agree a treaty on behalf of descendants of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, even without their agreement. "
https://homocomfortus.substack.com/p/the-voice-referendum
Like you indigenous has become sensationl;ised to suit Voice progress Never heard of some the BS presently dished out by urban dwelling indigenous but have seen many rorts being carried on from way back and I'm ninety one No flag no connected nation no common language no history all fragmented ideas since late last century when that manufactured "flag" appeared as a calling point for indigenous My maternal great grandfather taught aboriginals leather raft to ride & care for horses got them into native police where they used their status to exact payback on any other tribes & terrified the local ones They were real people not like todays who are torn between dreams and reality
I hear and read much about why we should vote no. However I don’t read much about a viable, practical alternative solution to take the place of the voice in parliament. Not just an idea, but something workable.
We have other countries that have gone before us on this matter and failed that we can learn from, but do we have other countries that have put successful indigenous policies in place that we can learn from?
It seems like a parallel to the ancient Israelites whom God ordained to live in (now) Israel. They were ordered to NOT worship the pagan gods of the Canaanites. What do we have today in modern Christian Australia? Exactly the same scenario. We take the knee we welcome to country and have smoking ceremonies to unbelievably drive away evil spirits. Is this not idolatry and pagan rituals? We see our illustrious PM and his henchmen at Aboriginal functions grinning like fools as the part Aboriginals parade their Stone Age practices in front of a civilised parliamentary delegation. They also display a lot of red. Now I may be wrong, but did the aboriginees have cloth making and red dyes in their culture?
On another note George, digital ID is heating up, yet again. The push is full on. One thing I didn't know - "Home Affairs and Cyber Security Minister Clare O'Neil recently announced new cyber governance and regulation changes making directors culpable for failing to properly secure digital assets. "
I wonder how many people are aware of this?
It's ironic "they" keep pushing the digital ID agenda to keep us "safe," when going even more digital is the cause for more hacking! (And monitoring of course).
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sponsored/KwMZrxyGPuvAS9TpKcK2/a-digital-identity-for-everyone-is-crucial-for-national-security/
I first understood this about 4/5 months ago and have been wondering why it remained unmentioned....
until now.
Thank you George.