We ignored his warnings.
Nation First looks at the unheeded exhortations given to the West by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn.
Check out all the news that they don’t want you to read at www.EurekaFreePress.com — your pro-freedom, Australian news source!
You can support Eureka Free Press at www.eurekafreepress.com/support-eureka-free-press or by clicking the button below.
Your support will help Eureka Free Press contract original news stories as well as market the site online, spreading pro-freedom news to as many Australians as possible.
Dear friend,
The King James Bible gives us this quote from Jesus Christ that, like all of what He said, rings true to this very day: “A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house.”
The saying basically means that those who speak out, point out errors and tell us to change our ways are not just ignored by those in the area in which they came from, but they are actively opposed.
But far from the prophet suffering from this ignorance and opposition, it is their homeland who actually suffers by rejecting the prophetic message which could possibly have saved them from some pending calamity.
You can watch the last Nation First YouTube video here:
New Nation First videos will start later this week! Subscribe to the YouTube channel.
That saying has been shorted in modern times to “a prophet isn’t welcome in his home town.”
That was certainly the case for one of the great prophets of the 20th century, exiled Russian writer and intellectual Alexandr Solzhenitsyn.
But while Solzhenitsyn’s commentary against the Communist ideology of Soviet Russia was welcomed in the United States of America and elsewhere in the Western world, his calls to action against Communism were not.
Neither were his critiques of Western civilisation which he rightly saw as suffering from moral decay, a lack of spiritual values and, worse still, a culture that prioritised consumerism, material wealth and individual pleasure above all else.
Here was the prophet calling out for repentance (which, from the Greek metanoia, literally means a turning around) by our society lest we slide into the totalitarian abyss that had engulfed his former homeland.
Solzhenitsyn also called for a renewed courage by the West to face down ideologies that undermined freedom such as Communism.
We ignored the prophet and now we suffer.
Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, a 20th century prophet, criticized both Communist ideology and the moral decay of Western civilization.
He was expelled from Russia in 1974 for publishing works critical of the Soviet Union and later settled in the United States, where he continued to write.
In his speech “A World Split Apart” delivered at Harvard University in 1978, Solzhenitsyn criticized the lack of courage in the West to stand up for its own values and warned of the dangers of a West with a spiritual vacuum slipping into communism.
Solzhenitsyn pointed out that the West’s decline in courage was particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and intellectual elite, resulting in a loss of influence on public life.
He also warned that the West’s materialistic humanism was making itself increasingly accessible to manipulation by socialism and communism, and that Western elites were encouraging the West's slip into communism.
We are now suffering the consequences of ignoring Solzhenitsyn’s warning to the West.
After suffering eight years imprisonment in a labour prison camp and then three years of internal exile, Solzhenitsyn was expelled from Russia in 1974.
The expulsion was triggered by the publication of several works critical of the Soviet Union, including “The Gulag Archipelago”.
Solzhenitsyn later settled in the United States, in the little known village of Cavendish, Vermont, where he continued to write about the dangers of Communism and its threat to Western values, as well as the West undermining itself.
If you want to a summary of Solzhenitsyn’s warnings to the West, you could possibly do no better than to read his speech of 8 July 1978 delivered at Harvard University and titled “A World Split Apart”.
It really is a jam-packed tour de force of a speech.
There is so much Solzhenitsyn has to say in it, but there are some very jarring sections to note.
The first such section highlights the loss of our Christian roots, leading to the rise of consumerism, materialism and hedonism in the West:
There is a disaster, however, which has already been under way for quite some time. I am referring to the calamity of a despiritualized and irreligious humanistic consciousness... On the way from the Renaissance to our days we have enriched our experience, but we have lost the concept of a Supreme Complete Entity which used to restrain our passions and our irresponsibility. We have placed too much hope in political and social reforms, only to find out that we were being deprived of our most precious possession: our spiritual life. In the East, it is destroyed by the dealings and machinations of the ruling party. In the West, commercial interests suffocate it. This is the real crisis.
The second such section highlights the lack of fight in the West to stand up for its own values and how this rot seemingly developed first (and, I would add, quite possibly deliberately) amongst the elite:
A decline in courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days. The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country, each government, each political party, and, of course, in the United Nations. Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the intellectual elite, causing an impression of loss of courage by the entire society. Of course, there are many courageous individuals, but they have no determining influence on public life.
The third such section highlights the danger of a West with a spiritual vacuum slipping into Communism, and of the Western elites who, at the time, were encouraging that slip (and, again I would note, still are today!):
As humanism in its development became more and more materialistic, it made itself increasingly accessible to speculation and manipulation by socialism and then by communism. So that Karl Marx was able to say that “communism is naturalized humanism.”
This statement turned out not to be entirely senseless. One does see the same stones in the foundations of a despiritualized humanism and of any type of socialism: endless materialism; freedom from religion and religious responsibility, which under communist regimes reach the stage of anti-religious dictatorships; concentration on social structures with a seemingly scientific approach…
The interrelationship is such, too, that the current of materialism which is most to the left always ends up by being stronger, more attractive, and victorious, because it is more consistent. Humanism without its Christian heritage cannot resist such competition. We watch this process in the past centuries and especially in the past decades, on a world scale as the situation becomes increasingly dramatic. Liberalism was inevitably displaced by radicalism; radicalism had to surrender to socialism; and socialism could never resist communism. The communist regime in the East could stand and grow due to the enthusiastic support from an enormous number of Western intellectuals who felt a kinship and refused to see communism's crimes. And when they no longer could do so, they tried to justify them. In our Eastern countries, communism has suffered a complete ideological defeat; it is zero and less than zero. But Western intellectuals still look at it with interest and with empathy, and this is precisely what makes it so immensely difficult for the West to withstand the East.
Sadly, we ignored Alexandr Solzhenitsyn’s warnings and now we are suffering the consequences.
We will touch more on those consequences tomorrow.
Until then, God bless you, your family and our nation.
Take care,
George Christensen
George Christensen is a former Australian politician, a Christian, freedom lover, conservative, blogger, podcaster, journalist and theologian. He has been feted by the Epoch Times as a “champion of human rights” and his writings have been praised by Infowars’ Alex Jones as “excellent and informative”.
George believes Nation First will be an essential part of the ongoing fight for freedom:
“The time is now for every proud patriot to step to the fore and fight for our freedom, sovereignty and way of life. Information is a key tool in any battle and the Nation First newsletter will be a valuable tool in the battle for the future of the West.”
— George Christensen.
Find more about George at his www.georgechristensen.com.au website.
Many elite intellectuals seem intent on impressing their attitudes and ideas on what they deem as lesser people fit only to serve them in the elites'visions We have all been given a body and brain and are expected to use them to the best of personal ability and not needing to be tied down to those considering themselves as higher level beings requiring servility to be able to exist. Solzhenitsyn suffered for his quiet but insistent beliefs and spoke out freely clearly unafraid by known reprisals His example of free speech should be the guideline used to heal this disturbed world being stifled by nonsensical wording and defiling any opposing ways of speech or using stupid activities to promote their views of saving the world Whatever part of the world has been saved has never been proved and a switch to more spiritual aspirations may change some visions
We can witness this happening before our eyes.