If you haven’t yet done so, subscribe to the Nation First e-newsletter via the feature below:
For consent (to be vaccinated) to be legally valid, the following elements must be present:
It must be given by a person with legal capacity, and of sufficient intellectual capacity to understand the implications of receiving a vaccine.
It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.
It must cover the specific procedure that is to be performed.
It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person.
Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
Despite the provisions against vaccine coercion contained in both the official Australian Government handbook on vaccinations and international human Rights, Australians who don’t get a COVID-19 inoculation face losing their job and/or losing certain freedoms.
This week I spoke with Andrew Smith and Bill Meuhlenberg on the Culture Watch Radio podcast about that extraordinary level of coercion taking place in what was supposed to be a voluntary COVID-19 inoculation program. Listen to the brief interview (of under 15 minutes) here:
Laws are now in effect in some Australian States, and some private corporations have adopted policies that either restrict people from accessing certain services or that cause people to lose their jobs (or both!), dependent upon the vaccination status of the people in question. In one State (of course the Socialist Republic of Victoria), duly elected Members of Parliament are no longer able to attend parliament if they are not vaccinated. Think on that for a moment: you can’t be elected a politician and speak in parliament if you are not vaccinated.
It begs the questions: Where are we headed? How do we end this madness?
(One political solution was the No Domestic COVID Vaccine Passports Bill 2021, that I co-sponsored, which would have prohibited governments and other non-government entities from issuing vaccine passports; and prohibited any discrimination on the basis of whether a person has had a vaccination in the provision of goods, services and facilities or in relation to employment, education, accommodation and sport. Sadly, when a motion was put to parliament to have that bill debated and voted on, the motion lost with only two MPs - myself and Craig Kelly MP - supporting a vote on the bill.)
Share this post
Your view: How do we fight the coercion?
Share this post
If you haven’t yet done so, subscribe to the Nation First e-newsletter via the feature below:
— Australian Government Department of Health’s Australian Immunisation Handbook.
— UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
Despite the provisions against vaccine coercion contained in both the official Australian Government handbook on vaccinations and international human Rights, Australians who don’t get a COVID-19 inoculation face losing their job and/or losing certain freedoms.
This week I spoke with Andrew Smith and Bill Meuhlenberg on the Culture Watch Radio podcast about that extraordinary level of coercion taking place in what was supposed to be a voluntary COVID-19 inoculation program. Listen to the brief interview (of under 15 minutes) here:
Laws are now in effect in some Australian States, and some private corporations have adopted policies that either restrict people from accessing certain services or that cause people to lose their jobs (or both!), dependent upon the vaccination status of the people in question. In one State (of course the Socialist Republic of Victoria), duly elected Members of Parliament are no longer able to attend parliament if they are not vaccinated. Think on that for a moment: you can’t be elected a politician and speak in parliament if you are not vaccinated.
It begs the questions: Where are we headed? How do we end this madness?
(One political solution was the No Domestic COVID Vaccine Passports Bill 2021, that I co-sponsored, which would have prohibited governments and other non-government entities from issuing vaccine passports; and prohibited any discrimination on the basis of whether a person has had a vaccination in the provision of goods, services and facilities or in relation to employment, education, accommodation and sport. Sadly, when a motion was put to parliament to have that bill debated and voted on, the motion lost with only two MPs - myself and Craig Kelly MP - supporting a vote on the bill.)
Perhaps the answer is to be found in the courts? It must be pointed out the courts have have failed to stop vaccine coercion so far.
Over to you for your thoughts. Comment below:
Authorised by G. Christensen, Mackay, for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party.