Quote: “Clearly they were watching the shooter but apparently have a no "first shot" policy.”… On what planet would USSS allow a shot before responding when a weapon is pointed at anyone in a crowd much less a POTUS!?!?!?
Some might say - "It's the American way" but of course, it happens all around the world.
The US Deep State, however, adopts the process of removing the political enemy on a regular occurrence as required. (They even do it for the Ukrainians.) The Clintons lead the way in suiciding their opponents or exposers.
The shooter was "allowed" his opportunity to take the kill shot x 5 before he, himself, was removed from the trail of evidence and cover-up. The SS snipers had their target for 40 seconds prior to the first shot but it appears they waited without sending a code red to security on the ground. The same FBI will conduct the investigation into this assassination attempt that conducted the investigation into January 6th and "Russia gate". The same FBI that raided Mar -a - Lago and found nothing on Hunter Biden etc
The CIA would have been involved with the shooter prior to this event. They probably groomed him and messed with his mind, maybe even helped train him to shoot and provided the weapon. Do I have Proof? NO, not yet but wait and see if I am correct.
This is how most of the gun attacks in the US have unraveled in the past.
Spare a thought for our own "Martin Bryant" who is wasting away in Risdon prison for being the poor soul who the CIA set up and framed for the Port Arthur massacre.
Yes, something is badly amiss. Like almost all these somewhat strange shootings, the shooters are almost always shot dead, leaving many unanswered questions as to motives.
Why are police and security guards not trained to shoot to disable rather than to kill. I cannot believe that they are not. Instinct shooting is pretty accurate, and a shot is delivered within 2 seconds or less. Surely, there are sufficiently good marksmen in their ranks to disable an assassin rather than to kill them., even at 150 yds. It is important in political assassinations to know whether the assassin is acting alone. The more turbulent the society the more likely the assassination is being done with accomplices. It is necessary to know.
A person shot in the appropriate shoulder, or hips or both, will most likely survive and enable the police to find a true motive. They will be very unlikely to fire another shot.
Mentally unfit radicalised on line or instigated by others this shooter failed to observe democracy but worse he cant tell about his evil motive Attending security around Trump seemed lacking in cohesion in dealing with nasty situation Why was shooter seen in advantageous spot on roof top without being warned or sent off Seems Trump is meant for other things by escaping that speeding bullet No deep investigation will follow shooter being deceased Trump alive covered in happy & suspicious felicitations but intending decision making & show of strength which America & world badly needs All world leaders should take care as precedent has been set
Sloppy security or was allowed to happen… trump gets more security than any other and former presidents… even Kevin Costner would have done better job as a body guard
George, the rally where the president was shot happened 8 miles from our home! My husband and many close friends attended the rally. You could see the counter-sniper locked in on that rooftop for over 3 minutes. Someone gave the "stand down" order. It was very clear.
I tend to agree with Prince's analysis of the event. I have never witnessed such a massive CF for want of a better description. The USSS were nothing short of amateurish, not one CP operator on stage, all down the front, clearly uncontrolled perimeter. The whole thing reeks and not just of incompetence.
One thing is certain, absolutely nothing will come from the subsequent 'investigation'.
Quote: “Clearly they were watching the shooter but apparently have a no "first shot" policy.”… On what planet would USSS allow a shot before responding when a weapon is pointed at anyone in a crowd much less a POTUS!?!?!?
Fishy definitely fishy.
Some might say - "It's the American way" but of course, it happens all around the world.
The US Deep State, however, adopts the process of removing the political enemy on a regular occurrence as required. (They even do it for the Ukrainians.) The Clintons lead the way in suiciding their opponents or exposers.
The shooter was "allowed" his opportunity to take the kill shot x 5 before he, himself, was removed from the trail of evidence and cover-up. The SS snipers had their target for 40 seconds prior to the first shot but it appears they waited without sending a code red to security on the ground. The same FBI will conduct the investigation into this assassination attempt that conducted the investigation into January 6th and "Russia gate". The same FBI that raided Mar -a - Lago and found nothing on Hunter Biden etc
The CIA would have been involved with the shooter prior to this event. They probably groomed him and messed with his mind, maybe even helped train him to shoot and provided the weapon. Do I have Proof? NO, not yet but wait and see if I am correct.
This is how most of the gun attacks in the US have unraveled in the past.
Spare a thought for our own "Martin Bryant" who is wasting away in Risdon prison for being the poor soul who the CIA set up and framed for the Port Arthur massacre.
Thanks George, that is amazing footage of the USSS not doing his job!
Yes, something is badly amiss. Like almost all these somewhat strange shootings, the shooters are almost always shot dead, leaving many unanswered questions as to motives.
Why are police and security guards not trained to shoot to disable rather than to kill. I cannot believe that they are not. Instinct shooting is pretty accurate, and a shot is delivered within 2 seconds or less. Surely, there are sufficiently good marksmen in their ranks to disable an assassin rather than to kill them., even at 150 yds. It is important in political assassinations to know whether the assassin is acting alone. The more turbulent the society the more likely the assassination is being done with accomplices. It is necessary to know.
A person shot in the appropriate shoulder, or hips or both, will most likely survive and enable the police to find a true motive. They will be very unlikely to fire another shot.
Mentally unfit radicalised on line or instigated by others this shooter failed to observe democracy but worse he cant tell about his evil motive Attending security around Trump seemed lacking in cohesion in dealing with nasty situation Why was shooter seen in advantageous spot on roof top without being warned or sent off Seems Trump is meant for other things by escaping that speeding bullet No deep investigation will follow shooter being deceased Trump alive covered in happy & suspicious felicitations but intending decision making & show of strength which America & world badly needs All world leaders should take care as precedent has been set
Sloppy security or was allowed to happen… trump gets more security than any other and former presidents… even Kevin Costner would have done better job as a body guard
George, the rally where the president was shot happened 8 miles from our home! My husband and many close friends attended the rally. You could see the counter-sniper locked in on that rooftop for over 3 minutes. Someone gave the "stand down" order. It was very clear.
"A Murder is Announced" - Agatha Christie
I tend to agree with Prince's analysis of the event. I have never witnessed such a massive CF for want of a better description. The USSS were nothing short of amateurish, not one CP operator on stage, all down the front, clearly uncontrolled perimeter. The whole thing reeks and not just of incompetence.